3418 Meadow Wood Lane, Crozet VA 22932 |
|
Test Panel Reports |
|
Our panel of testers included people whom we believed represented various age and skill levels. We have also had voluntary, unsolicited, reports from early users. We had three reasons for asking a panel to test the product:
For the most part, criticisms (#2, above) were limited to appearance factors. These are indicated below in red italic text; our response is in normal blue text. We think this will help you make an informed purchase descision. |
". . .too much black in the mix. In fact, it sort of takes
on the look of the cork roadbed. . . ." |
|
"seems to be quite large for HO . . . several of the pieces were about 6 scale inches.
. ." |
|
"Unless the ballast
could be made in smaller size, or this was way cheaper than most other types and
kinds of ballast, I would probably not buy it." |
|
"The size, however, is way too small. It looks
more like dirt rather than mainline track ballast." While there is no "dirt" in Buck's Ballast, the powdery component of the mix does make the ballast look "dirty" when it is applied dry. Pictures at right illustrate the appearance when applied dry, and then later (still wet from glue). |
|
"Seems to require slightly more than my
current ballast" |
Summary and Conclusions |
|
The good criticisms we have received are familiar to us, for they are also made
with respect to other brands of ballast - and other brands of anything at all,
for that matter. Most reflect user preference and perception and we certainly
agree that people should follow their own preferences. Observation of physical
and technical properties can, perhaps, be made a bit more objectively; either
something performs as claimed - or it doesn't. We are pleased that most users
have affirmed the product performance. We offer Buck's Ballast as the superior value proposition for your money. We believe it hits the sweet spot of appearance, performance and cost and if the early reports are any indication, you will, too. |
|